|
|
|
The Romans believed they had to "civllize the long- haired Celts" in Gaul and Britannia, same as European Christians believed they had to "civlize" Native Americans without even first trying to find out what their culture was all about. But if the civilization of the Romans was really so wonderful, we wouldn't have had the political assassinations like on Julius Caesar of the decadent and gruesome extravagancies of the likes of Caligula, nor would the revolt by Spartacus ever have been necessary if the slaves had been treated so wonderfully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure they had a great bathing culture which is a fine thing to have been introduced in other parts of Europe but sadly it was all done by means of conquest. Sometimes there can be more important things to think of to class as civilized, even in a time when human rights did not exist yet. In terms of inventions, science and engineering the Inca's, Aztecs and Mayans were pretty much on the same level as the Romans were as they too had their pipe lines, aqueducts, temples, calendars, etc. That other tribes in the Americas didn't build any cities shouldn't really matter in this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To the Romans, the Celts were savages. The Celts were later forced to embrace Roman culture, and be "civlized" into Roman culture by being given the opportunity to become a Roman citizen, otherwise they'd be slaves. Later on everybody in Europe was Christianized and it didn't matter anymore, as with the discovery of other continents, nobody in Europe was considered savage anymore now but now it was those of another race or who were not Christians like them. But like I said, there are more important things to consider in a civilization or culture than just inventions and technology or a complex society. I would think that the way people treat other people and family ties are much more important than all this. Would anyone disagree with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|